Hook Library Generation
Claude generates 60-100 candidate hooks per project against documented buyer pain points and competitor angle gaps. Human review filters to a 30-strong tested library. What used to take a week now takes a day.
A boutique performance practice augmenting media buying with Claude for strategy and Higgsfield AI for creative production. Faster hypothesis testing. Sharper angle iteration. Lower long-run cost-per-qualified-lead. Discipline before automation.
Most agencies adopting AI fall into one of two failure modes. Either they generate generic AI creative and ship it without brand calibration (the output is sloppy and Meta-policy-risky). Or they outsource strategy itself to AI prompts (the output is shallow and undifferentiated).
We use AI for what it's actually good at: collapsing the production bottleneck between hypothesis and tested creative. Strategy stays human. Hypothesis stays human. Brand calibration stays human. AI does the iteration math at machine speed in between.
Claude generates 60-100 candidate hooks per project against documented buyer pain points and competitor angle gaps. Human review filters to a 30-strong tested library. What used to take a week now takes a day.
Higgsfield AI produces static and motion variants calibrated to brand-aesthetic guidelines. Each ad ships with 4-8 visual variants instead of 1-2. A/B testing converges on winning creative 60% faster.
Claude reviews live ad copy weekly against angle hypothesis, surfacing creative-fatigue patterns and copy-vs-image misalignment 7-14 days before traditional human review would catch them.
AI auto-classifies inbound leads by qualification depth before they hit the sales floor. Pre-qualifies form submissions on intent signals. Saves sales-team 6-10 hours of triage per week per project.
The AI selects the contextually appropriate first-touch template based on which ad creative the lead clicked. No more generic "Hi, thanks for your interest" templates that waste lead-warmth.
Weekly performance reports synthesised by Claude — not from raw Meta dashboards, but from the angle-vs-outcome hypothesis. What worked. What didn't. What to test next. Decisions, not data dumps.
How your project is positioned, against whom, with what differentiation — this is human-only thinking. AI suggests; humans decide. Strategy frameworks aren't outsourced to prompts.
The weekly feedback loop with your sales team is human conversation. The grading conversation about which leads converted and why can't be replaced by sentiment analysis.
You'll always speak with a human strategist on calls and reviews. We don't deploy AI chatbots, AI-generated weekly summaries without human review, or AI-handled escalations.
RERA compliance for real estate, accuracy of placement claims for study abroad, Meta policy adherence — these are human-reviewed before every campaign launch. Errors here cost clients money.
Three concrete things. (1) Strategy analysis: Claude is used for hook-library generation, ad-copy auditing, and angle ideation against documented buyer pain points. (2) Creative production: Higgsfield AI generates static and motion variants 3-5x faster than studio production, calibrated to brand-aesthetic guidelines. (3) Performance analysis: AI-augmented review of ad performance against angle hypothesis, surfacing creative-fatigue patterns earlier than human review. We don't use AI to replace strategy — we use it to compress iteration time.
No, because AI is one input, not the output. Every AI-generated variant goes through brand-aesthetic review before it ships. Higgsfield is calibrated to your visual identity (colour palette, typography, photography style, brand voice). The output is closer to 'studio creative produced 5x faster' than 'AI-generated stock-feel content'. Generic AI output is what happens when agencies skip the calibration step.
Engagement fees are similar to a standard performance retainer — AI doesn't cut your bill. What it does cut is your effective cost-per-creative-iteration. A traditional agency ships 4-6 new creatives per month per project; we ship 15-25 because the production bottleneck is collapsed. More iterations means faster convergence on winning creative, which means lower long-run CPL.
Both. The Claude + Higgsfield + Make.com stack is internal — we run it for all engagements. For clients with sufficient scale, we also help architect their own internal AI workflows (custom Claude projects, n8n automations, Google Sheets webhook orchestration) so they can own the capability long-term. This is offered as a separate consulting engagement.
Yes, when handled correctly. Meta's ad policies don't restrict AI-generated creative per se, but they do enforce truthfulness, originality and disclosure rules around generated human likenesses. Our workflow includes a compliance pass on every AI-generated variant — Meta-policy alignment, brand-image rights, and (for real estate specifically) RERA-compliance review.
AI augments three qualification layers. (1) Hook-to-form alignment scoring — does the form question architecture match the angle the lead clicked? (2) Lead-quality grading — auto-classifying leads by qualification depth before they hit the sales floor. (3) WhatsApp template selection — the AI picks the most contextually appropriate first-touch template based on the ad-creative the lead clicked. Saves 6-10 hours of manual sales-ops work per week.
We'll show you exactly where AI compresses time in your funnel — and where it doesn't.